Monday, 30 June 2014

Damn those Fates. It's FREE!!!!!

Download it FREE from here!


It appears that the Fates (whose heads I'm going to smash in with a lump hammer next time I see them) are hell-bent on preventing me from offering my stunning collection of short stories - God, Aliens, Death & Teapots - to the great reading public, free of charge.
Not only is Amazon insisting on charging £1.99 for it (even though it's available from my uber-cool publishers at £0.00), an unexplained glitch on Autharium's own website meant that even though it was available from them for free, it wasn't actually possible to download it!
That would explain why 'sales' of what has to be (even though I say so myself) an incredibly imaginative, witty and thought-provoking septet of mini-literary masterpieces, have been so disappointingly low :(

But not anymore, folks - the problem's fixed!
Yee-Haa!!

Download it FREE from here!

And if that wasn't enough, there's a big virtual hug, sloppy kiss, or hearty shake of the hand from me to anyone who clicks the download button - all you need to do is indicate your preference as a comment at the end of this post :)

And if that still wasn't enough, I've included the first few paragraphs from one of the stories to pique your interest and get you racing to part with absolutely none of your money, at all, whatsoever - this one's entitled:

Why Do Pandas Look So Sad?


 I never really thought much about pandas before it happened. To me, they were just large, cuddly, bear-like creatures that spent most of their time sitting around, chewing on bamboo shoots and struggling to get laid. I only ever once saw one in real life, and that was when I took my children to the zoo one holiday whilst my wife was working away. As my eldest daughter, Alice, read aloud the words on the colourful information board:
‘...only 1,600 left in the wild...’
‘...confined to the mountains of western China...’
‘...shrinking habitat...’
‘...facing extinction...’
I hoisted my youngest up onto my shoulders so she could get a better view of the animal. Together, we watched as, true to form, it was sitting in the centre of its enclosure on a small mound of earth, munching on a pile of bamboo shoots. That was virtually all it did. Occasionally, it did seem to pause for a moment, as if it had thought of something; but then it would commence its munching again, looking vacantly ahead. Just once, it did stop eating completely, putting aside the bamboo and casting its gaze around its enclosure. It stared for a while in our general direction. Then, it gathered up more bamboo shoots, looked away and began eating again. Not once, in the seven or eight minutes that we were standing there watching it, did it make any effort to move from where it was sitting.
To me, the thing just looked bored.
But, Louisa; well, she saw something else.
‘Why do pandas look so sad?’
At the time, the question hardly registered because Alice had finished reading the information board and had announced that she now wanted to move on and look at the giraffes and then the lions and then the hippos. As a result of this distraction, I’m not sure I ever answered Lou’s question; if I did, I can’t remember what it was I said.
But if my darling little daughter were able to ask me that very same question now (and how I wish to God that she could), the answer I could give her would, I’m sure, bring tears to those bright blue eyes of hers, just as the mere thought of it now brings tears to my own.

 Looking back, I guess we would really like to call it an invasion. That would at least suggest there was an intention to occupy, to subjugate, perhaps eventually to exterminate; and that would in turn suggest that we, the human race, had been a consideration. But the truth of the matter is that we were probably worthy of no more than a passing thought; that to them, we were, all seven billion of us, creatures of...
It took me quite some time (and Christ knows I’ve had plenty of that) to figure out the word that best describes how I think mankind was regarded:
That word is INCONSEQUENTIAL.
To them, we were creatures of inconsequence, no more a part of their thinking as earthworms and woodlice and beetles are to a man in an excavator loading giant mounds of earth into trucks.
No, this was never an invasion.
It was...asset-stripping.
Nothing more, nothing less.

Sunday, 29 June 2014

Book Review - Ragged Souls by Ernest San Giacomo



The Book on Amazon UK


Of the three stories which Ernesto has included in Ragged Souls, I enjoyed the final one, Cactus Valley, the most. That's not to say that I didn't enjoy the first two, though I felt that with regards to the first story in particular, A Purveyor of Odd Things, there is actually a much better, bigger story in there, fighting to get out. There's a sense of the plot and the character development having been 'squeezed' into a short story, resulting in some elements of the narrative (particularly the burgeoning relationship between the two main characters) feeling rushed. I also felt that this story, perhaps more than the second and third ones, needed the 'bizarre' element to be more fully explained.
Story number two, Martha's Kitchen, is quite heavy on dialogue, which may not be to everyone's taste. However, the backstory and the two main characters, Martha and Jillian, are developed to a more satisfyingly level. The plot twist, when it arrives, is pleasingly sudden. The final scene, in my humble opinion, would have more impact if it were considerably shorter, but that doesn't really detract from the overall tale.
Story number three, Cactus Valley, as I mentioned earlier, is my favourite. Ernesto creates two interesting, though not entirely likeable, main characters and engenders a good sense of isolation and peril around them. There is an almost comedic element to this tale, based on a clash of ideologies, which is the most satisfying of the three 'bizarre' twists.
Overall, three very readable short stories that I'd certainly encourage people to have a look at.

Saturday, 28 June 2014

It's Time to Get Tough On Time!!

Below is a picture of Rafa Nadal starting his service action at Wimbledon this year.
Nothing too astonishing about that, you might say.


The problem is that, prior to this moment, Rafa has:
  • towelled himself down (left arm, right arm, face)
  • examined the three tennis balls he's been given by the ball-boy
  • dispensed with one of the balls and put one in his pocket
  • bounced the ball several times with his racquet
  • picked his knickers out of his bum crack
  • adjusted his tee-shirt on his shoulders
  • wiped the sweat from his nose
  • put his hair behind his left ear
  • wiped the sweat from his nose
  • put his hair behind his right ear
  • bounced the ball several more times
all of which takes time - 27 seconds, on average, in his recent match against Lukas Rosol, which is 7 seconds longer than he is permitted to take in a Grand Slam tennis tournament.
But has anyone pulled him up on this?
Nope.
Should they?
Well, yes, I think they should.
I know that some people will argue that it's all part of Rafa's 'routine' and that it's not intentional and that the extra time not only gives Rafa the opportunity to compose himself (and perhaps recover from a long rally on the previous point) but also his opponent, but that's not really the issue, is it.
The issue is whether a rule of the game should be flouted so often and to such an extent - if it is to be so, then just get rid of the rule altogether and let players take as long as they want; if not, then get the display in the corner which shows serve speed to double as a shot-clock and if the ball isn't in play by the time it gets to zero, then the point goes to the receiver - that would certainly make players like Rafa conform.
(just for your info, the Daily Mail put the following numbers up for the top players from their recent matches: Murray, 21 seconds - Djokovic, 23 - Federer, 15, Sharapova, 24)

Oh, and one other thing with regards to 'gamesmanship' in tennis - have a look at this rule:
Note that it places the onus on the receiver to play to the reasonable pace of the server.
Now, next time you watch Maria Sharapova receiving, notice how she turns her back on the server, fiddles with the strings of her racquet and suchlike, and only turns round to receive when she is ready.
Go on, watch her…

Gamemanship?
I think so.
And don't get me started on her screaming as she hits every shot…
Or 'comfort breaks'…
Or calling the trainer to massage a tired muscle...